When scanning a QR or Data Matrix code on a label using the Project Assistant app, it can happen that you get an error message that the MAC address cannot be found (1) or that only part of the address is correctly extracted (2).
First of all, there are different types of labels:
product labels (on the device)
box labels (on the outside of the box/packaging)
installer / UX labels (inside the box /packaging)
Symptom (1) can only happen when scanning a product label because some QR or Data Matrix codes do not contain a MAC address, depending on the product, even though the MAC address is available in plain text right next to the code.
The box and installer label codes, however, always contain the MAC address information.
Symptom (2) can happen when scanning certain installer labels due to legacy formatting.
We have further standardized the labels so that the symptoms mentioned above will be resolved. There will be a transition period, however. As an alternative for symptom 1, you will have smooth experience when preferably scanning the box label. If you encounter symptom 2, we ask you to enter the MAC address manually or use the December 2018 release of the Project Assistant (version 1.2)
PS: For full transparancy on QR code / Data Matrix content and/or troubleshooting purposes, you can use conventional code scanning apps available in the resepective app stores.
The Bosch VRM Monitor page does not open correctly, but instead displays an Error.
Any Replay client requesting video from the Bosch Video Recording Manager service, only receives the Time-Line but the video is alway Black.
Bosch VRM by default uses Ports 80 & 443.
In most cases the problem is caused by another web server (e.g. IIS) that is installed on the same machine and is also making use of the default web ports 80 & 443.
Bosch Video Recording Manager (VRM)
Bosch Video Managment System (BVMS)
Bosch Video Client (BVC)
Bosch Video Security Client (VSC)
Any Replay Client/ Managment System which accesses recorded video data via HTTP/HTTPS
Disable any of the other web services or change the default Ports they are using.
Bosch software is distributed via the Bosch website, but can also be re-distributed by Bosch partners. It is important for the system-installer to check if the installation file he or she has received, matches exactly with the output of the engineering process. There are several risks that, in the distribution path, changes are made to the installation file. Keyloggers or other spyware could be added to the installation, or in theory video surveillance footage could be routed to external resources.
The attached document describes how the integrity of software can be checked.
The name that you assign to a camera in the Project Assistant is currently not displayed in the Configuration Manager device list. This will be fixed with the next version of the Project Assistant, which is planned to be released in November 2018.
Setting camera name in Project Assistant
Current Configuration Manager view (based on Project Assistant version 1.1)
Camera name is only displayed in the "Camera name" section on the right-hand side, not in the device list on the left. You only see the camera's IP address.
The attached documents should help you to make the upgrade process as smooth as possible. The upgrade itself is not restricted to BVMS software only. The supported software and firmware versions can be found in the release notes of the related BVMS version.
An attachment is added to this article for each BVMS version. Currently the upgrade guides for BVMS 8.0 and 9.0 are attached to this article. From BVMS 10.0 onwards a description on how to migrate systems has been included as well.
Firmware The table below lists the firmware versions which are used in the BVMS 8.0 system test. Bosch Video Stitcher 126.96.36.199 VideoSDK 6.12.0078 Firmware MPEG-4 4.15.0002 Firmware CPP3 5.74.0004 Firmware CPP4 6.41.0037 Firmware CPP5 6.30.0047 Firmware CPP6 6.41.0037 Firmware CPP7 6.41.0037 Firmware CPP7.3 6.41.0037 Firmware CPP-ENC 5.53.0004 (for VIP X1600 XFM4) Firmware CPP-ENC 5.97.0005 (for VJT XF E family, VIDEOJETdecoder 3000) Firmware X1/X2 2.53.0005 VIP XD HD 1.8 VJD 7000 54.8.2 VJD 8000 9.00.0134 VRM 3.70.0056 VSG 6.42.0010 iOS 9.0.2 / 9.3.5 / 10.3.1 Web Client 11.0.96 Software The table below lists the software versions which are used in the BVMS 8.0 system test. BIS 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 DiBos 8.7 BRS 8.10/8.11 Allegiant MCS 2.94 / 2.95 Intuikey Keyboard 1.96 DVR FW Version 2.3.2 (DVR400 / 600) 3.61 (DIVAR 700) 2.5.0 (Divar AN 3000/5000) 1.2.1 (Divar Network/Hybrid) SQL Server 2014 Operating systems Operator Client Windows 8.1 64-bit; Windows 10 64-bit creators update (1703) Config Client Windows 8.1 64-bit; Windows 10 64-bit; Windows Server2012 R2 64-bit; Windows Server 2016 64-bit. Management Server, Mobile Video Service Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 64-bit; Windows Server2012 R2 64-bit; Windows Server 2016 64-bit. Cameo SDK 188.8.131.52 BVMS SDK 184.108.40.206 RCPP 220.127.116.11 Hardware drivers NVIDIA Quadro Quadro Pro Driver for Microsoft Windows 7/8.1 (64-Bit) 385.08 (28.June 2017) Quadro Pro Driver for Microsoft Windows 10 (64-Bit) 385.69 (21.September 2017) AMD FirePro Unified Graphics Driver for Windows 8.1/10 (64- bit) 17.Q3 (27.July 2017) Bosch strongly urges customers to use the driver and software versions mentioned above. This ensures that the software can perform its task reliably.
In many cases a minimum and maximum retention time needs to be defined in a video surveillance systems due to legal requirements. While the minimum retention time defines the time period for how long video recordings need to be stored, the maximum retention time defines after which period of time the recordings have to be deleted. Thus, the minimum retention time is going to influence the amount of storage needed. The higher the minimum retention time the more storage space is required.
Hence, the storage space needs to be large enough to store the recordings for the minimum retention. For the maximum retention time this doesn’t have to be the case. Still users might be confused why recordings gaps might appear sort-of randomly, if the system does not have enough storage space to keep all recordings until the maximum retention time is reached. To understand what is going on we have to remember the principle of the VRM block assignment first.
For each camera in the system the BOSCH Video Recording Manager (VRM) generates a list of recording blocks (LUNs) on which the camera can next record. Therefore, the VRM makes an estimation based on the data rate and the amount of data of each camera in the system (global optimization). Basically, the VRM predicts when which camera needs a new block and always lists the block which will be the oldest block at the time the camera needs to record on the next block. One could think of it as a “next oldest block” estimation done by the VRM. But the prediction of the VRM might differ from the reality (mainly because of variance in recording bitrate) and this can cause recording gaps if the storage space is not large enough to support the maximum retention time.
Let’s have a closer look on the following two cases:
Sufficient storage space for maximum retention time
Insufficient storage space for maximum retention time
Sufficient storage space for maximum retention time
In case of sufficient storage space to fulfill the maximum retention time for every camera in the system no random recording gaps will appear, because the VRM will always assign a block containing recordings, which are older than the maximum retention time. Thus, for each camera the recording blocks will be kept until the maximum retention time is reached as illustrated in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Enough storage space to cover the maximum retention time for each camera of the system
Insufficient storage space for maximum retention time
In case the system is designed such that the storage space is not large enough to store all recordings from all cameras until the maximum retention time is reached, the VRM will of course still do its estimation and predict the oldest recording block when a camera will ask for a new block. Assuming an ideal setup (with ideal network connection where each camera has the same data rate and all cameras record the same amount of video data simultaneously), the oldest block would always be assigned by the VRM. Hence, no recordings gaps should appear for recordings older than the minimum retention time, compare Figure 2. This is was most customers falsely assume or expect.
Figure 2: Customer expectation of the system behaviour in case of insufficient storage space to cover the maximum retention time for each camera of the system
However, in reality the stated assumptions do not apply. Network connection, data rate, amount of recorded video data, etc. varies. Thus, the “next oldest block” estimation of the VRM can differ from reality. Since each camera already got its block list from the VRM and records according to this block list, it can happen that not the truly oldest block is used and recording gaps appear as shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3: System behaviour in case of insufficient storage space to cover the maximum retention time for each camera of the system
How to avoid or minimize this effect
To avoid this effect of random recording gaps simply add enough storage to your system. To get the best out of your system in terms of storage usage, the optimum would be to set the maximum retention time to storage limit, see Figure 4, but that is almost impossible to realize in practice.
Figure 4: In principle a maximum retention time set to the storage limit would avoid random recording gaps
Option 1 to minimize the effect in practice is to estimate the maximum retention time so that it will not exceed the storage limit of the system as illustrated in Figure 5.
Figure 5: Maximum retention very close to the storage limit will minimize the random recording gaps
Another less recommended option is to set a smaller time difference between the minimum and maximum retention time. But especially when the minimum retention time is shifted closer to the maximum retention time that introduces the risk that the VRM cannot free up storage space in case the minimum retention time is reached, which might result in a recording stop. Thus, we recommend to go for the first option.
One last hint: Changing the retention time on a running system is not going to influence the retention time of already recorded blocks. but will of cousre only be applied to new recorded video footage. Hence, changing the retention time is no option for an immediate change of required storage.
Compared to hardware, in which it is relatively easy to define an end-of-support concept based on the expected lifetime, software behaves totally different. In theory, when the environment does not change, software can still be running ten years after it has been installed. As new versions of the software are released regularly, it is important for customers to know what they can expect from Bosch Building Technologies when the software is purchased. This document describes how Bosch Building Technologies handles the life-cycle of the BVMS, BIS, AMS, and APE, and in which state a specific release can reside. Additionally this document lists the up-to-date situation for all of those software packages.